Internal Self-determination and the Prevention of Secession in International Law /
Internal self-determination (ISD) empowers communities to shape their destiny within a state, transforming tension into opportunity. By actively engaging citizens in decision-making, governments can tailor policies to meet unique cultural and economic needs, quelling discontent and building trust. T...
Main Author:
Format: eBook
Language: English
Published:
Leiden ; Boston :
Brill | Nijhoff,
2025.
Series:
Developments in International Law ;
82.
International Law E-books Online, Collection 2026.
Subjects:
Online Access: Login to view Source
Tags: Add Tag
Call Number: KZ4028
- Acknowledgments
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 1 Significance of the Topic
- 2 Originality and the State of Art in Legal Scholarship
- 3 Methodology
- 4 Chapters Outline
- 2 The Right of a People to Self-Determination
- 1 The Meaning, Importance and Problems of the Right to Self-Determination
- 2 History of the Right to Self-Determination
- 2.1 Self-Determination before wwii
- 2.2 United Nations Era
- 3 Two Main Aspects of the Right to Self-Determination
- 3.1 External Self-Determination
- 3.2 Internal Self-Determination
- 4 The Position of the Right to Self-Determination in International Law
- 4.1 Erga Omnes Character
- 4.2 Jus Cogens
- 5 Content
- 5.1 Entitlements Contained in External Self-Determination
- 5.2 Entitlements Contained in Internal Self-Determination
- 6 Addressees
- 6.1 Rightsholders of External Self-Determination
- 6.2 Rightsholders of Internal Self-Determination
- 7 Self-Determination as Both a Collective and an Individual Right
- 3 The Right to Secession in International Law
- 1 Motives for Secession
- 1.1 Economic Reasons for Secession
- 1.2 Legal-Political Reasons for Secession
- 1.3 Socio-Cultural Reasons for Secession
- 2 Secession: Notions, Position in International Law, and Theoretical Perspectives
- 2.1 Definitional Attempts
- 2.2 Secession and the Right to Self-Determination
- 2.3 Theories of Secession (Introductory Remarks)
- 3 Threefold Understanding of the Relationship between International Law and Secession
- 3.1 Secession as a Legally Irrelevant Fact: a Critical Analysis of the General Claim
- 3.2 Secession is Prohibited: International and Domestic Practice
- 3.3 Secession is Permitted (Remedial Theory and Moral Justifications)
- 4 In Lieu of a Firm Conclusion: Reflections on Divided International Legal Perspectives on Secession in the 21st Century
- 4 Internal Self-Determination as a Method of Preventing Secession in International Law: Theoretical Approach
- 1 General Observations (Hypothesis)
- 2 Various Meanings of Internal Self-Determination
- 2.1 isd as a Free Will and Non-Intervention
- 2.2 isd as Inclusiveness and Non-Discrimination
- 2.3 isd as Self-Government and Territorial Autonomy
- 2.4 isd as a Conglomerate of Human Rights
- 3 Internal Self-Determination as a Secession Prevention Method
- 3.1 Orthodox and Qualified Counter-Secession Visions of ISD
- 4 Secession Prevention Tools of ISD
- 4.1 Democratic Governance
- 4.2 Federalism
- 4.3 Autonomism
- 5 Internal Self-Determination and other Legal Means of Secession Prevention
- 5.1 Territorial Integrity
- 5.2 Uti Possidetis Juris
- 5.3 Non-Intervention, Non-Use of Force and Non-Domination
- 5.4 Domestic Law
- 6 Non-legal Methods of Secession Prevention
- 6.1 Demobilization (Generally)
- 6.2 Internal and External Engagement
- 7 Challenges in Utilizing ISD as a Tool to Prevent Secession
- 7.1 The Neutrality of Secession Paradigm in International Law
- 7.2 Threshold for Disallowing Secession and Competent Authority
- 7.3 The Universality of the Rule
- 7.4 Applicability in Existing v. Aspiring States: Exploring Incommensurability
- 7.5 In Contradiction with Liberal Democracy?
- 8 The Added Value of Internal Self-Determination
- 8.1 Stability of Borders and Conflict Avoidance
- 8.2 Protection and Advancement of Human Rights
- 9 Opinion of Commentators
- 5 Internal Self-Determination as a Method Preventing Secession in International Law: State and Institutional Practice
- 1 Prolegomenon
- 2 State Practice
- 2.1 Travaux Préparatoires: Friendly Relations Declaration
- 2.2 Debates in the United Nations General Assembly Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian & Cultural Issues)
- 2.3 Reports to the Human Rights Committee
- 2.4 Submissions in the icj's Kosovo Case
- 2.5 The Liechtenstein Initiative on Self-Determination
- 2.6 National Legislature
- 2.7 Domestic Judicial Practice
- 3 International Organizations Practice
- 3.1 The United Nations
- 3.2 Regional Organizations Approach
- 4 Internal Self-Determination as Customary International Law?
- 5 Towards the Definition of ISD's Content: What Does a State Need to Do?
- 6 Internal Self-Determination in European States
- 1 Preface
- 2 Internal Self-Determination in Federal European States
- 2.1 Belgium (Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels)
- 2.2 Germany (Bavaria)
- 3 Internal Self-Determination in Unitary European States
- 3.1 Finland
- 3.2 Three Levels of Governance
- 4 Internal Self-Determination in Former European States
- 4.1 The Historical Case of Yugoslav Federalism and Its Implications Today
- 7 Conclusions
- Index.
