Is R2P a Legal Norm? : State Practice and Opinio Juris 2000-2022 /
Many ask if R2P is legally binding or not. By following the development of R2P from 2000-2022 and governments interactions with it throughout those years internationally, regionally and nationally, a perspective is given regarding its development as a norm within international law. The state practic...
Main Author:
Format: eBook
Language: English
Published:
Leiden ; Boston :
Brill | Nijhoff,
2025.
Series:
Human Rights and Humanitarian Law E-Books Online, Collection 2025.
International Criminal Law Series ;
19.
Subjects:
Online Access: Login to view Source
Tags: Add Tag
Call Number: KZ4082
LEADER | 04555nam a22005298i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BRILL9789004706736 | ||
003 | nllekb | ||
005 | 20241030073724.0 | ||
006 | m d | ||
007 | cr un uuuua | ||
008 | 240912s2025 gw sb 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | |a 2024033708 | ||
020 | |a 9789004706736 |q (electronic book) | ||
020 | |z 9789004706729 |q (print) | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/9789004706736 |2 DOI | |
035 | |z (OCoLC)1440216771 | ||
040 | |a NL-LeKB |c NL-LeKB |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 4 | |a KZ4082 | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 026000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LAW |x 051000 |2 bisacsh | |
072 | 7 | |a LBBZ |2 bicssc | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 345/.02322 |2 23 |
100 | 1 | |a Naga, Dareen H. Aboul, |e author. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is R2P a Legal Norm? : |b State Practice and Opinio Juris 2000-2022 / |c Dareen H. Aboul Naga. |
246 | 3 | |a State Practice and Opinio Juris 2000-2022 | |
264 | 1 | |a Leiden ; |a Boston : |b Brill | Nijhoff, |c 2025. | |
264 | 4 | |c ©2025 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (425 pages) : |b illustrations. | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law E-Books Online, Collection 2025 | |
490 | 1 | |a International Criminal Law Series ; |v 19 | |
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | |t Acknowledgment -- List of Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 1 Research Question -- 2 Methodology and Points of Novelty -- 3 Division of Study -- Part 1: R2P and the Sources of International Law -- 1 The Framework -- 1 The Introduction of R2P to the UN -- 2 Is R2P a Norm and Its Placement within the Sources of International Law -- 3 Conclusion -- 2 Norm Life Cycle -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Finnemore and Sikkink' 'Norm Life Cycle' -- 3 The Norm Life Cycle Stages Adjusted for the Analysis of R2P -- 4 Norm Characteristics and Structure -- 5 Link between the Norm Life Cycle and Norms as a Source of International Law -- 6 Conclusion -- Part 2: R2P Development (2000-2011) -- 3 Stage 1: Norm Emergence (2000-2005) -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Stage I: Norm Emergence -- 3 R2P's Normative Development by 2005 -- 4 Conclusion -- 4 Stage 2: Efforts of R2P Promotion (2005-2011) -- 1 R2P in Hibernation Pre-2011 -- 2 Academic View of R2P Development -- 3 Conclusion -- 5 R2P Application - Libya (2011) -- 1 Deepening of Norm Cascade -- 2 Successful R2P Application? -- 3 Conclusion -- Part 3: The Development of R2P (March 2011-December 2021) -- 6 R2P Post-March 2011 -- 1 Cascade Continued -- 2 R2P Development within the UN Post-March 2011 -- 3 Conclusion -- 7 P5, Europe and Canada; Opinio Juris and State Practice -- 1 The P5 -- 2 Canada -- 3 Europe -- 4 Conclusion -- 8 Asia, Asia-Pacific and Oceania; Opinio Juris and State Practice -- 1 Australia, New Zealand and the Republic of Korea -- 2 Japan, Pakistan, Singapore -- 3 Sri Lanka and Myanmar -- 4 Conclusion -- 9 Africa, Latin America and the Arab Region; Opinio Juris and State Practice -- 1 Latin America -- 2 Africa -- 3 Arab Region -- 4 Conclusion -- Part 4: Deductions and Findings -- 1 A Reconstruction of R2P -- 2 R2P's Development as a Norm -- 3 Conclusion -- Part 5: Bibliography -- Table of Cases -- Table of Legislations -- Table of International Legal and Regional Materials -- Table of Other Primary Legal Resources -- Bibliography of Secondary Resources -- Index. | |
520 | |a Many ask if R2P is legally binding or not. By following the development of R2P from 2000-2022 and governments interactions with it throughout those years internationally, regionally and nationally, a perspective is given regarding its development as a norm within international law. The state practice and opinio juris of countries from different regions, representing varying perspectives, and the application of R2P throughout those years, provide the reader with insights on where R2P stands after more than 20 years of being part of the international fora. See Less | ||
546 | |a English | ||
588 | |a Description based on print version record. | ||
650 | 0 | |a International criminal law. | |
650 | 0 | |a Responsibility to protect (International law) | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |t Is R2P a Legal Norm? : State Practice and Opinio Juris 2000-2022. |d Leiden ; Boston : Brill | Nijhoff, 2025. |z 9789004706729 |w (DLC) 2024033707 |
830 | 0 | |a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law E-Books Online, Collection 2025. | |
830 | 0 | |a International Criminal Law Series ; |v 19. | |
856 | 4 | |z DOI: |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004706736 | |
942 | |2 lcc |c EBOOK | ||
999 | |c 59688 |d 59688 |