Is R2P a Legal Norm? : State Practice and Opinio Juris 2000-2022 /

Is R2P a Legal Norm? : State Practice and Opinio Juris 2000-2022 /

Many ask if R2P is legally binding or not. By following the development of R2P from 2000-2022 and governments interactions with it throughout those years internationally, regionally and nationally, a perspective is given regarding its development as a norm within international law. The state practic...

Full description

Saved in:

Main Author: Naga, Dareen H. Aboul (Author)

Format: eBook

Language: English

Published: Leiden ; Boston : Brill | Nijhoff, 2025.

Series: Human Rights and Humanitarian Law E-Books Online, Collection 2025.
International Criminal Law Series ; 19.

Subjects:

International criminal law.
Responsibility to protect (International law)

Online Access: Login to view Source

Tags: Add Tag

No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Call Number: KZ4082

Save to List Photographic Request Become a member
Table of Contents:
  • Acknowledgment
  • List of Abbreviations
  • Introduction
  • 1 Research Question
  • 2 Methodology and Points of Novelty
  • 3 Division of Study
  • Part 1: R2P and the Sources of International Law
  • 1 The Framework
  • 1 The Introduction of R2P to the UN
  • 2 Is R2P a Norm and Its Placement within the Sources of International Law
  • 3 Conclusion
  • 2 Norm Life Cycle
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Finnemore and Sikkink' 'Norm Life Cycle'
  • 3 The Norm Life Cycle Stages Adjusted for the Analysis of R2P
  • 4 Norm Characteristics and Structure
  • 5 Link between the Norm Life Cycle and Norms as a Source of International Law
  • 6 Conclusion
  • Part 2: R2P Development (2000-2011)
  • 3 Stage 1: Norm Emergence (2000-2005)
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Stage I: Norm Emergence
  • 3 R2P's Normative Development by 2005
  • 4 Conclusion
  • 4 Stage 2: Efforts of R2P Promotion (2005-2011)
  • 1 R2P in Hibernation Pre-2011
  • 2 Academic View of R2P Development
  • 3 Conclusion
  • 5 R2P Application - Libya (2011)
  • 1 Deepening of Norm Cascade
  • 2 Successful R2P Application?
  • 3 Conclusion
  • Part 3: The Development of R2P (March 2011-December 2021)
  • 6 R2P Post-March 2011
  • 1 Cascade Continued
  • 2 R2P Development within the UN Post-March 2011
  • 3 Conclusion
  • 7 P5, Europe and Canada; Opinio Juris and State Practice
  • 1 The P5
  • 2 Canada
  • 3 Europe
  • 4 Conclusion
  • 8 Asia, Asia-Pacific and Oceania; Opinio Juris and State Practice
  • 1 Australia, New Zealand and the Republic of Korea
  • 2 Japan, Pakistan, Singapore
  • 3 Sri Lanka and Myanmar
  • 4 Conclusion
  • 9 Africa, Latin America and the Arab Region; Opinio Juris and State Practice
  • 1 Latin America
  • 2 Africa
  • 3 Arab Region
  • 4 Conclusion
  • Part 4: Deductions and Findings
  • 1 A Reconstruction of R2P
  • 2 R2P's Development as a Norm
  • 3 Conclusion
  • Part 5: Bibliography
  • Table of Cases
  • Table of Legislations
  • Table of International Legal and Regional Materials
  • Table of Other Primary Legal Resources
  • Bibliography of Secondary Resources
  • Index.